State of Washington

Ethics Advisory Committee

Opinion 95-14

Question

May a judicial officer join the League of Women Voters?

Answer

CJC Canon 5(B) permits judicial officers to participate in civic activities which do not reflect adversely upon their impartiality or interfere with the performance of their judicial duties. Canon 7(A) restricts the political activities of judicial officers by providing that they may not: 1) hold office in a political organization; 2) make speeches for a political organization or nonjudicial candidate, attend political gatherings, or purchase tickets for political party dinners or other functions; and 3) engage in any other political activities except on behalf of measures to improve the law, the legal system or the administration of justice.

The League of Women Voters engages in political activities, that is, it endorses and opposes ballot measures that are concerned with matters unrelated to the improvement of the law, the legal system and the administration of justice. It is therefore inappropriate for a judicial officer to be a member of the League of Women Voters because the judicial officer cannot be distinguished from the position that the League of Women Voters takes in matters unrelated to the law.

The Supreme Court adopted a new Code of Judicial Conduct effective January 1, 2011. In addition to reviewing the ethics advisory opinions, the following should be noted:

CJC 3.1
CJC 3.7
CJC 4.1

Opinion 95-14

06/05/1995

 

Privacy and Disclaimer NoticesSitemap

© Copyright 2024. Washington State Administrative Office of the Courts.

S5